A market research was conducted in 2006 on the frequency and percentage distribution of the tourists and local citizens of
On the other hand, the survey also showed that majority of the frequency distribution was basically on 25 to 54 age range. Coincidentally, Wight in 1999b, Holland et al in 1998, and Meric and Hunt in 1998 supposed that ecotourists were characteristically within this age group. Although, this may also mean that the selected respondents of the study were matured enough to answer the survey questions. Obviously, they belong to the Adult group. However, notably, the figures indicated very minimal tourists and local citizens of
Table 2: Frequency, and percentage distribution of the
Tourists and local citizens of
Considering this selective nature of tourism spots, organizers must reckon with the benefits that this particular national activity may gain. Whelan in 1991, Boo in 1992, Buckley in 2004b, Kiss in 2004, Krugger in 2005, Tisdell and Wilson in 2005 supposed that ecotourism is an appropriate means for sustainable development, in addition to the commercial benefits, community development that may be in place and the environmental conservation techniques that may be evolved. Besides, Alcock et al in 1994 indicated that ecotourism is educational as the activity endows participants the reward of appreciating nature at its natural setting. Meanwhile, Lindberg in 1991 and
No comments:
Post a Comment